Analytical solutions of the non-linear, parabolic partial differential Eq. (2.3) are hard to find and making a numerical approach is very appealing. Nevertheless, analytical solutions may contain a significant amount of physical insight and can be used to verify more complex numerical models of soil heat flow.
In order to use Fourier theory, we assume that the heat capacity
and the thermal conductivity
are independent of temperature and time. Equation (2.3) can then be Fourier transformed with respect to time to give an ordinary differential equation for the
th harmonic, namely
Assuming depth, time and temperature independent thermal properties throughout the soil, and imposing the boundary conditions
and
, the physically relevant solution of Eq. (2.5) immediately follows and yields
In natural environments, thermal properties are rarely homogeneous throughout the soil. Soil type, soil composition and moisture content may vary considerably with depth and location. Several analytical (Shao et al., 1998; Massman, 1993; Wiltshire, 1982; Wiltshire, 1983) and approximate solutions (Nerpin and Chudnovskii, 1984; Thakur and Momoh, 1983) of the heat conduction equation with depth dependent coefficients have been studied. All analytical solutions either depend on additional assumptions about the periodicity of the solution or assume a parametric model of the thermal properties as a function of depth. According to a study by Massman (1993), the most successful approximate solution is the one proposed by Nerpin and Chudnovskii (1984). It is based on the WKB2.1 approximation which describes the propagation of waves in inhomogeneous media.
For the sake of brevity, only a very simplified situation will be considered here. We assume that the functional form of the thermal properties is known to be linear in a certain soil layer